Who goes there? hankering, gross, mystical, nude; How is it I extract strength from the beef I eat? What is a man anyhow? what am I? what are you? All I mark as my own you shall offset it with your own, Else it were time lost listening to me. I do not snivel that snivel the world over, That months are vacuums and the ground but wallow and filth. Whimpering and truckling fold with powders for invalids, con- formity goes to the fourth-remov'd, I wear my hat as I please indoors or out. Why should I pray? why should I venerate and be ceremonious? Having pried through the strata, analyzed to a hair, counsel'd with doctors and calculated close, I find no sweeter fat than sticks to my own bones. In all people I see myself, none more and not one a barley-corn less, And the good or bad I say of myself I say of them. I know I am solid and sound, To me the converging objects of the universe perpetually flow, All are written to me, and I must get what the writing means. I know I am deathless, I know this orbit of mine cannot be swept by a carpenter's compass, I know I shall not pass like a child's carlacue cut with a burnt stick at night. I know I am august, I do not trouble my spirit to vindicate itself or be understood, I see that the elementary laws never apologize, (I reckon I behave no prouder than the level I plant my house by, after all.) I exist as I am, that is enough, If no other in the world be aware I sit content, And if each and all be aware I sit content. One world is aware and by far the largest to me, and that is my- self, And whether I come to my own to-day or in ten thousand or ten million years, I can cheerfully take it now, or with equal cheerfulness I can wait. My foothold is tenon'd and mortis'd in granite, I laugh at what you call dissolution, And I know the amplitude of time.
Afterword
“I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well,” Thoreau wrote in Walden, the publication of which coincided with the first edition of Leaves of Grass. “Unfortunately, I am confined to this theme by the narrowness of my experience.” His experience was indeed circumscribed—“I have traveled much in Concord,” he said ironically of his daily rambles in the woods outside Boston—and his orientation toward the world seemed to differ markedly from Whitman’s expansiveness, his urge to embrace the whole of Creation. But were they so different? Each sought universal meaning through the medium of the self, Thoreau gauging his portion of reality largely in nature, Whitman imagining lives far removed from his own: “In all people I see myself,” he writes in this section, “none more and not one a barley-corn less,/ And the good or bad I say of myself I say of them.” What they shared was curiosity, which, coupled with meticulous observation, led them to grasp enduring truths about their respective walks in the sun; what they witnessed and recorded for posterity, the one preferring wilderness to the company of men, the other welcoming everything into his field of vision, are cornerstones of American literature. On his deathbed, when asked if he could sense whether there was in fact an afterlife, Thoreau is reported to have replied, “One world at a time.” For Whitman the afterlife was always here and now, stretching from the origins of the universe into the distant future. Nor did death frighten him, since he believed that more worlds awaited him. “I know the amplitude of time,” he wrote—and this he measured not with coffee spoons but like an astronomer tracking the orbit of a celestial body no one has seen before: the poet who wears his hat indoors and out.
Question
Whitman seems to take joy in encouraging us not only to accept but to celebrate our bodies. Bodies are what we all share and are thus, for Whitman, the very basis of democratic thinking. Do you think that if we actually worshipped our bodies, as Whitman suggests we do, there would be less violence in the world, or is body worship the origin of violence?