I believe a leaf of grass is no less than the journey-work of the stars, And the pismire is equally perfect, and a grain of sand, and the egg of the wren, And the tree-toad is a chef-d'oeuvre for the highest, And the running blackberry would adorn the parlors of heaven, And the narrowest hinge in my hand puts to scorn all machinery, And the cow crunching with depress'd head surpasses any statue, And a mouse is miracle enough to stagger sextillions of infidels. I find I incorporate gneiss, coal, long-threaded moss, fruits, grains, esculent roots, And am stucco'd with quadrupeds and birds all over, And have distanced what is behind me for good reasons, But call any thing back again when I desire it. In vain the speeding or shyness, In vain the plutonic rocks send their old heat against my approach, In vain the mastodon retreats beneath its own powder'd bones, In vain objects stand leagues off and assume manifold shapes, In vain the ocean settling in hollows and the great monsters lying low, In vain the buzzard houses herself with the sky, In vain the snake slides through the creepers and logs, In vain the elk takes to the inner passes of the woods, In vain the razor-bill'd auk sails far north to Labrador, I follow quickly, I ascend to the nest in the fissure of the cliff.
Afterword
If Wordsworth depicts the growth of the poet’s mind in The Prelude, establishing a model for the workings of the creative intelligence, which has informed artistic practice down to the present, then Whitman addresses in this section its cosmic model, “the journey work of the stars,” which is a grander view of creation. “Evolution is not the rule in Nature, in Politics, or Inventions only, but in Verse,” Whitman wrote—a bold claim borne out by his radical poetics. Indeed he insisted that “Leaves of Grass is evolution—evolution in its most varied, freest, largest sense.” Free verse was for him not only a way of thinking but a spur to innovation—in the language, in the body politic, and in the body itself, “compend of compends,” which incorporates everything from the lowly pismire and plutonic rocks to the razor-billed auk sailing north. The poet always follows.
One spring morning, walking along a beach by the Pacific, under an eroding cliff which from time to time sheds heavy layers of sandstone, my friend recalled seeing a clutch of baby rattlesnakes fall from a fissure a hundred feet above us. Why their den was located in such an exposed place was a mystery to my friend, who not long before had acquired a condominium on top of a cliff farther up the beach. Maybe they liked the view, I joked. Bad luck, she replied, and went on to speculate on what role luck might play in evolution. What good luck, I thought, that in his imagination Whitman kept ascending “to the nest in the fissure of the cliff,” opening himself to the elements and the risks of evolution, physical and spiritual, poetic and political. He believed that American democracy would continue to evolve, along the same line as “Song of Myself,” which he knew contained the seeds of future poems, in every language, as well as fruits and grains, gneiss and esculent roots, sunlight and the sand beneath our feet…
Question
By imagining a body produced by the forces of evolution, Whitman illustrates one way that (as he said in the preface to the 1855 Leaves of Grass) scientists are the “lawgivers of poets.” How is a body that is imagined as an evolved thing different from a body that is imagined as a divinely created thing? Is it possible to imagine an evolved body to have been made in the image of God?